User talk:Németh Máté

Welcome!

Hi Németh Máté! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:47, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Tony Costa confirmed victims.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Tony Costa confirmed victims.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:47, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Most Evil Killers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Griffiths. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for letting me know! I didn't notie my mistake, so I refixed that! Have a nice day! - Máté

List of rampage killers

In the article List of rampage killers in the United States

Ronald Gene Simmons is in the list List of rampage killers (familicides in the United States)

Banks, George Emil is in the list List of rampage killers (familicides in the United States)

Roof, Dylann is in the list List of rampage killers (religious, political, or ethnic crimes)

Marco, Jennifer San is in the list List of rampage killers (workplace killings)

Devoe, Paul is in the list List of rampage killers (home intruders in the United States)

Johnson, Micah Xavier is in the list List of rampage killers (religious, political, or ethnic crimes)

Please check the other sections carefully before adding the killer to the list Template:Rampage killers navbox

Unknown4321unknown (talk) 15:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Unknown4321unknown! I am sorry fo this, I didn't realized that it could be a problem. What should I do, remove them or leave it there? Thank you for calling my attention, and for your advice!

Bye: Máté

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Németh Máté! Your additions to Marie Robards have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hut 8.5 18:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It does certainly look like you wrote at least part of this by copying another source extremely closely. For example this (which you added):

Then, one night in January 1994, during her senior year of high school they studied Shakespeare’s Hamlet. According to her, Stacey turned to her favorite part of the play: the soliloquy of Danish monarch Claudius, who poisoned his brother (Hamlet’s father) to gain the throne. Stacey recited Claudius speech in which he wonders if he can ever repent

This magazine article wrote something extremely similar:

Then, one night in January 1994, during her senior year of high school... Marie was studying Shakespeare’s Hamlet with Stacey, one of the school’s most popular girls. According to Stacey’s version of events (which Marie has never denied), Stacey turned to her favorite part of the play: the soliloquy of Danish monarch Claudius, who poisoned his brother (Hamlet’s father) to gain the throne...Stacey recited Claudius’ agonizing speech in which he wonders if he can ever repent

Changing a few bits isn't enough I'm afraid, it's called close paraphrasing. You need to write the text in your own words. We do also expect that articles are based on reliable sources and that they cite sources to back up the content. The video you linked to isn't a reliable source (although the magazine article likely would be). Hut 8.5 12:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mark of a Killer

Hello, Németh Máté,

Thank you for creating Mark of a Killer.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references, to meet general notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Whiteguru:,

I appreciate your advice and insight, since this is my first created page.

I will give more references as you mentioned. I’m glad that this is the only problem you found with the page, so I will edit it soon.

Thank You for your advice!

Máté Németh Máté (talk) 06:20, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Németh Máté, I see you have done some work on the article, and supplied references. In this instance, as you are on a learning curve, I have passed article. A key independent, reliable reference would be to add some reviews about this series. That would help, significantly. Can I draw your attention to this → WP:UGC? This article is one of our policies and draws attention to the sorts of things we don't call reliable sources. It is worthy of consideration as part of your learning about Wikipedia. Go well! --Whiteguru (talk) 20:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced biographical details

Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted a change you made to Lauri Hendler. In this edit, you added a birth date, but you didn't cite a reliable source. Wikipedia has strict rules on content in biographies of living persons because this can impact real peoples' lives. Please be aware that many sites on the internet purport to give information about celebrities, but few of them of reliable. Sites like the IMDb use user-generated content, and they should not be cited in biographical articles. Similarly, celebrity gossip websites should not be used because most of them don't have a history of fact checking or publishing corrections. Fan sites and blogs are self-published and have no editorial control. We also can't use primary documents, such as government birth databases or genealogical websites (which are also typically user-generated, as above). This means that the number of available sources is quite slim, and we often have to either go without this information or wait until a source like Entertainment Weekly or the BBC publishes an interview that includes a birth date. If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, you can ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Melrose, Florida, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The source you cited is not a reliable source per Wikipedia standards. Melrose is an unincorporated community with no defined boundaries, and there is therefore no way to definitively count the population. Donald Albury 12:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]